As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The main objectives of police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and higher than all make certain regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only done if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were effectively mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the moment petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and private respondents and will get care of all the facets of the case and make sure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to these past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it's convenient for just a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to eliminate a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has achieved into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's reached these types of stage. Read more
In some jurisdictions, case law is usually applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of your police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, make sure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated earlier mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to both party plus the case shall be decided via the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
Statutory laws are All those created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. Even though this style of legislation strives to form our society, delivering rules and guidelines, it would be not possible for virtually any legislative body website to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well set up now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to your civil servant service construction but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority could if contented that a civil servant who was entitled for being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his very own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that this kind of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of spend and allowances of these types of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a nicely-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.